4 ms·
The only way someone could get that data is if they demanded physical access and fired anyone who stood in the way. An impossible task if you ask me!
by doomboiardee 7mo ago
The only way someone could get that data is if they demanded physical access and fired anyone who stood in the way. An impossible task if you ask me!
- hotsauceror 7mo agoIf I recall, that was exactly what happened early on in DOGE's tenure. Senior personnel were explicitly directed to grant admin access to DOGE personnel, and auditing/logging were disabled. This was widely reported at the time. I don't remember whether there were threats of termination, but it would not surprise me.
- lelandbatey 7mo agoYes, that's the joke
- hotsauceror 7mo agoSorry. I started switching off of coffee this week...
- FireBeyond 7mo agoThe "fun" thing was when some agencies started then seeing access attempts from Russian IPs sometimes as soon as 15 minutes after this happened, using credentials that were valid and created by/for DOGE people...
- abustamam 7mo agoHonest question. Why isn't stuff like this a bigger deal? Why isn't anyone being held accountable for what is undeniably a national security incident? I can understand why the administration would try to bury it. But I wouldn't have heard of most of the shitty stuff Doge employees have done were it not for HN. Why isn't this getting more media coverage?
- FireBeyond 7mo agoRight? And many of the DOGE people who were outed were shown/known/had convictions for being involved in cybercrime gangs and such. I get it, in a controlled manner, for some cybersecurity jobs, but even at face value, that was nothing about what was DOGE was doing.
- Cipater 7mo agoBecause the US populace and US media only holds Democrats to account. Republicans can do whatever they want.