2 ms·

I made one of the comments that seems to be perceived a critical of the changes (I made a statement about the seemingly brief paragraph on changing semantics).

I made one of the comments that seems to be perceived a critical of the changes (I made a statement about the seemingly brief paragraph on changing semantics). As I replied to Andrew, I will tell you: the PR had a large amount of planning and implementation that seems of great quality. I certainly did not intend to discredit you or the obviously large amount of work you have done previously or on the change. I guess that will teach me to post without even more caveats.

mlugg 7mo ago
Oh, no problem at all & no shade of any kind intended! I just wanted to clarify this point since it seems like a good few people got that misconception. That doesn't mean you can't discuss breakage anyway, or ask questions of the development / language design process :)
kristoff_it 7mo ago
Your comment was reasonable, I don't know why it got downvoted that hard.