3 ms·
Defining the security boundary is more secure than not defining it. This is a meaningful difference between what my bot does (has access to what you give it acc
by stavros 8mo ago
Defining the security boundary is more secure than not defining it. This is a meaningful difference between what my bot does (has access to what you give it access to) vs what OpenClaw does (has access to everything, whether you want it to or not).
If you want perfectly secure computing, never connect your computer to the network and make sure you live in a vault. For everyone else, there's a tradeoff to be made, and saying "there's always a risk" is so obvious that it's not even worth saying.
- croes 8mo agoOf course it‘s more secure but it doesn’t mean it’s secure.
- scdlbx 8mo agoNothing is secure.
- croes 8mo agoBut there is a difference between insecure against your actions or because of you actions. Someone breaking in into your system and doing damage is different to handing out the key to an agent that does the damage. AI has still too many limits to hand over that of responsibility to it. And because it also endangers third parties it’s reckless to do so.