> build a demonstrable history of making high-quality contributions to lesser known projects. > Seems like an obvious solution I'm not sure how you would rank

> build a demonstrable history of making high-quality contributions to lesser known projects. > Seems like an obvious solution I'm not sure how you would rank quality of submissions for grading contributors like this. Just because a project accepted your PR doesnt make it high quality, the best we can hope for is that it was better than no accepting it?