3 ms·
I can definitely write programs to solve real world problems. I think you're just so set on your answer that you're not recognizing the flexibility that exists.
by godelski 8mo ago
I can definitely write programs to solve real world problems. I think you're just so set on your answer that you're not recognizing the flexibility that exists. Your argument isn't so different from all the ones I hear that argue that science is useless and that it's engineers who do everything. It has the exact same form and smell albeit with different words. But as generalists we understand abstraction, right?
- nomel 8mo agoyes you, a general intelligence, write a specific expert for a specific problem. > If you want to argue that we don't need the concept of AGI, because something like specific experts could be enough to drastically change the economy, then sure! That would be true. But I think that's a slightly different, complimentary, conversation. Even then, say we have all these experts, then a system to intelligently dispatch problems to them...maybe that's a specific implementation of AGI that would work. was to prevent this comment chain. I think we'll have to give up at this point, with whatever smells you may be attempting to communicate with me. Cheers!