Bad human code is usually fairly obvious, bad LLM code often less so, because it’s trained to produce superficially sensible-looking code. Hence reviewing it re

Bad human code is usually fairly obvious, bad LLM code often less so, because it’s trained to produce superficially sensible-looking code. Hence reviewing it requires higher alertness and is more work. The other problem is that LLMs allow a human to submit much larger amounts of code to be reviewed than if they had to write the code themselves.