3 ms·
> Kay was probably riffing off of that. You don't need to hypothesize about all this, to put things in their proper context you could listen to the speech wher
by justin66 8mo ago
> Kay was probably riffing off of that.
You don't need to hypothesize about all this, to put things in their proper context you could listen to the speech where he famously said it.
https://youtu.be/aYT2se94eU0?t=324 https://youtu.be/aYT2se94eU0?t=324
- rramadass 8mo agoYeah, i knew of the video. That somewhat proves the point i make here - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47331352 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47331352 People only focus on that phrase since it makes a nice "talking point" and ignore all the other interesting things from Kay's talk. For example; i never knew that most of Euler's proofs were wrong w.r.t. rigorous approach as defined today!
- chris_wot 7mo agoIf you knew of the video, then why didn't you mention it?