3 ms·
There's a serious proposal along the same lines: https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2025/25241-ai-watermarks.pdf https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2025/25241-ai-watermarks.p
by Retr0id 8mo ago
There's a serious proposal along the same lines: https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2025/25241-ai-watermarks.pdf https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2025/25241-ai-watermarks.pdf
- marginalia_nu 8mo ago(Flashbacks from the horrors in the Byte Order Mark wars)
- lxgr 8mo agoMaybe considered serious by its proponents.
- bob1029 8mo agoI feel like there is an unofficial version of AGTI already in place for certain AI providers. Whenever I generate a large amount of code, there is a ~20% chance that my editor will pop a warning "Some unicode characters in this file could not be saved in the current codepage". I suggest taking a look at the raw outputs of a major AI provider in a hex editor. That (zero-width) whitespace could be hiding a lot of information.
- wizzwizz4 8mo ago> For example, every other letter in this sentence is U+2060. No it isn't! The PDF renderer has stripped them out.