2 ms·
I object to calling people chatting online artists. However, ultimately nobody is going to pay them more than the value of their posts to the AI company which
by Retric 7mo ago
I object to calling people chatting online artists.
However, ultimately nobody is going to pay them more than the value of their posts to the AI company which puts a severe cap on what that’s actually worth. People who post a great deal of online content might be worth compensating a few thousand dollars, but it would be hard for them to then turn that down.
- numpad0 7mo agoI think the lower bounds of someone signing away rights to their whole art portfolio is more towards $1m than few thousands. Few k is just a month's salary that they can "make" themselves. Offers that small would be almost off-putting.
- Retric 7mo agoThat would be true if they gained the exclusive ability to reproduce works etc. AI companies want a license to train not ownership of a portfolio.