4 ms·
Unless your llm works by quoting large parts of copyrighted works, reinterpretations of them aren't copyrighted. Because it's not a copy.
by Saline9515 8mo ago
Unless your llm works by quoting large parts of copyrighted works, reinterpretations of them aren't copyrighted. Because it's not a copy.
- taneq 8mo agoWhat if the output regurgitates some other legal entity’s boilerplate licence agreement? Is the output automatically licensed to that entity?
- direwolf20 8mo agoNo, the copyright is the colour of the bits, and red bits with a comment saying "these bits are blue" are not blue bits, but you may be prosecuted for fraud.
- cj 8mo agoIt's wild to me that there haven't been more court cases to answer questions like those being asked in this thread. No one knows.
- dec0dedab0de 8mo agoIt's new, fast-moving technology, and the courts are slow and expensive. It would take two stubborn businesses with a lot of money deciding that it is better to battle it out than focus on their business. Something like IBM v SCO or Oracle v Google.