3 ms·

I compared their original policy, which DoW was not violating, against their revised policy from less than two weeks ago, which they released after unfruitful n

I compared their original policy, which DoW was not violating, against their revised policy from less than two weeks ago, which they released after unfruitful negotiations with DoW. They don't say the same thing.

ImPostingOnHN 7mo ago
Then you compared the wrong things. Mass domestic surveillance of civilians and fully-autonomous killbots were excluded from the contract signed about a year ago. That is why the DoD sought to force anthropic to modify the contract to include those 2 things, with no other changes. Even though the terms of the contract prevail over the general public Terms Of Use, one can look at the general public TOU from before the contract was signed [0] and see that it explicitly forbade mass domestic surveillance of civilians: "Do Not Use for Criminal Justice, Law Enforcement, Censorship or Surveillance Purposes" Pretty cut and dry, if we're going by the TOU. 0: https://web.archive.org/web/20250501151043/https://www.anthropic.com/legal/aup https://web.archive.org/web/20250501151043/https://www.anthr...