3 ms·
They took a base model, trained on but not reproducing work, so entirely fair with no theft, and then tried to tweak it so it could make money for an artist.
by protocolture 8mo ago
They took a base model, trained on but not reproducing work, so entirely fair with no theft, and then tried to tweak it so it could make money for an artist.
- kennywinker 8mo agoExcept that as soon as it is used to create work, it’s reproducing work that is derived from what it was trained on. Not just the stuff it was TUNED on or asked to derive style from.
- protocolture 8mo agoIts derivative but not to any infringing extent.
- Timwi 8mo agoAre you a lawyer? If not, you can't make that assertion with that level of confidence.
- junofan 8mo agoAs somebody who occasionally votes for laws I’ll make whatever assertions I want with whatever confidence I want. Lawyers are for legal advice, which isn’t what’s being discussed AFAICT.
- protocolture 8mo agoAre you running around holding the people claiming that its definitely theft to that standard or just me?