22 ms·
> They don't lack the understanding, they are simply paying enough attention to understand that the administration is already breaking the law and flagrantly vi
by vetrom 7mo ago
> They don't lack the understanding, they are simply paying enough attention to understand that the administration is already breaking the law and flagrantly violating the constitution.
Are you asserting that the current administration has materially interfered with elections? How so? Please attribute sources which spring forth from documentary disclosure, court discovery, or attributable sources.
> Congress is functionally non-existent right now, having given up congressional power over both taxation and war.
I'd say the current non-talking filibuster grandstanding shows this to be patently false. As such the conclusions in the rest of the paragraph are unsupportable.
> Iran as a Holy War. [0]
As I have mentioned elsewhere, the only reporting I can see from this comes from a single source activist litiguous organization who says their sources are anonymous. If any of those sources were actionable, IGs, their own lawyers, and numerous members of Congress would absolutely jump on them. It would be a carreer-makibg litigation move against any administration. Why havent they?
- tastyface 7mo agoDonald Trump has tried to overthrow an election once already -- first through conspiracy, then through violence. The fact that he's not rotting in a prison cell is largely due to corruption of the judiciary (Aileen Cannon). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_fake_electors_plot https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_fake_electors_plot https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump%E2%80%93Raffensperger_phone_call https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump%E2%80%93Raffensperger_ph... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_6_United_States_Capitol_attack https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_6_United_States_Capito...
- solid_fuel 7mo ago> The fact that he's not rotting in a prison cell is largely due to corruption of the judiciary That, and a persistent failure of congress to act. The Senate could have removed him from office and preventing him from running again after the insurrection attempt. They failed to.
- solid_fuel 7mo ago> Are you asserting that the current administration has materially interfered with elections? Yes? They certainly tried to, and failing doesn't wipe that away. You clearly have paid no attention. Go watch the January 6th hearings and report back with your findings. Everything you are looking for is right there, complete with sources. > I'd say the current non-talking filibuster grandstanding shows this to be patently false. You think congress failing to exercise it's power shows that it can still exercise its power? What a curious exercise in mental gymnastics. I will maintain my current conclusion - congress has shown repeatedly that it cannot and will not exercise its constitutionally granted power. Don't pull something while you stretch and reach to claim that isn't so. > Why havent [sic] they? Lawsuits take time, this was only a few days ago. [0] https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/GPO/January%206th%20Committee%20Final%20Report%20and%20Supporting%20Materials%20Collection https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-fin... [1] https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/GPO/January%206th%20Committee%20Final%20Report%20and%20Supporting%20Materials%20Collection https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-fin...
- camillomiller 7mo ago>> As I have mentioned elsewhere, the only reporting I can see from this comes from a single source activist litiguous organization who says their sources are anonymous. Is Pete Kegseth quoting the fucking Psalms on a press conference enough?