3 ms·

I would argue such enforcement does not need automation and such automation is often for revenue generation vs saftey focused. Also, I am a bit biased here aft

by ggiigg 7mo ago

I would argue such enforcement does not need automation and such automation is often for revenue generation vs saftey focused. Also, I am a bit biased here after working at flock.

aziaziazi 7mo ago
Is there a non-automatic light enforcement other than placing a policemen at every light - which makes the light useless? Revenu generation is a bonus point: in my country taxes that incentive smokers to quit are directed to healthcare and most of the speeding tickets revenue goes to road maintenance and safety. I’d prefer a public handling but the trend is privatization with everything : from health to education to water treatment. Even military assets! IMHO red light tickets enforcement is as much important.
- deleted 7mo ago
  [deleted]
- ggiigg 7mo ago
  > California's new speed camera pilot (AB 645) explicitly solves for this. Your mixing up states. California's law from above comment is NOT about running red lights.
amrocha 7mo ago
[flagged]
- deleted 7mo ago
  [deleted]