3 ms·
Has anyone done any performance testing on this yet? Just curious if the new bitmap GC is more efficient with memory and also if 2.0 is faster as it was promise
by salimmadjd 14y ago
Has anyone done any performance testing on this yet? Just curious if the new bitmap GC is more efficient with memory and also if 2.0 is faster as it was promised.
- nivloc 14y agoBenchmarks don't mean much until it's released, if ever. But I was playing around with it, and it's hard not to get excited about performance! | mem | time | p1 | -24% | -3% | p2 | -8% | -12% | p3 | -31% | -12% | avg | -21% | -9% | (over 1.9.3) Those are a couple workers I fired up for an hour. p2 relies on a C library, which might account for the smaller drop in memory usage. CPU needs investigation. The numbers are kinda useless, but look good anyway.