Not that I want to be seen blindly defending the CIA's actions or anything, but the article's saying that people accusing the CIA of keeping this hidden in a va

Not that I want to be seen blindly defending the CIA's actions or anything, but the article's saying that people accusing the CIA of keeping this hidden in a vault for 60 years. Yet, the article has been out in the open for 12 years and people still didn't notice it. So why are we assuming malice in the first case when we can assume that, like it wasn't discovered in the open, it was probably just stuck in a vault and nobody knew it existed closed either. So this just sounds like "we found one obscure document that had an interesting detail..." and is trying to extend a whole thing out of it? I can imagine that these kinds of things will all slowly come to light with AI-led discovery now.