3 ms·
Wait -- I'm fairly certain this is obvious to the person you were responding to. It may not be obvious to a lay person (who may not even know LLMs are trained
by kenjackson 7mo ago
Wait -- I'm fairly certain this is obvious to the person you were responding to. It may not be obvious to a lay person (who may not even know LLMs are trained at all). But I think this is obvious to almost all people with even a small understanding of LLMs.
- RobRivera 7mo agoI'm actually pretty convinced they're a troll or at the very least a high confrontation participant who is quick to move goal posts, ignore entire chains of logic, engage in ad hominim attacks of other posters, and is bringing zero novel insight anywhere in this thread
- simianwords 7mo agoone of the posters said it can't even reason through chess, i ran the actual benchmark, spent money and actually proved that it can beat a 1000 elo chess engine. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47316787 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47316787 does this show i'm a troll? throughout this thread there has been misinformation that i have been dispelling. what you are doing is ad hominem. here's another post where i ran the prompt that the person asked which would apparently show that LLM's can't reason https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47316855 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47316855 have you considered that you might be misinformed so what i say might look like trolling?
- RobRivera 7mo agoWhat do you do for work?