3 ms·
> If policing is done by robots, then humans are expected to be infallible The reality is that the people doing the policing are counting on humans not being i
by bluefirebrand 8mo ago
> If policing is done by robots, then humans are expected to be infallible
The reality is that the people doing the policing are counting on humans not being infallible
Fines have become an important revenue stream, that's why they are being automated.
Now that this is becoming more widespread, there's a perverse incentive for governments to maximize the difficulty in avoiding fines. Lower the speed limit on roads designed for higher speeds for "safety", etc
- spankalee 8mo ago> that's why they are being automated There are many citizens, like me, begging for red light cameras so something can be done about the rash of crashes and killings from willfully reckless drivers.
- bluefirebrand 8mo agoWhy would a willfully reckless driver care about a camera? In my experience preventative measures only work on people who are conscientious, they do not work on people who do not give a shit
- triceratops 8mo agoThen the camera lets us identify and take reckless drivers off the road.
- quickthrowman 8mo agoIs there proof that red light cameras increase safety? I would expect an increase in rear-end crashes after red light cameras are installed, with a slight decrease in fatal t-bone accidents. I wouldn’t expect them to make driving safer for anyone, as enforcement doesn’t do anything to moderate the behavior of people that just don’t give a shit.
- rootusrootus 8mo ago> Fines have become an important revenue stream, that's why they are being automated Maybe we should legislate traffic fines out of existence, and just use points. Or at the very least the fines should never go back in any recognizable way to the budget of the police doing the enforcement.