4 ms·
They cannot, because for some reason GrapheneOS is shitting on them https://x.com/GrapheneOS/status/2029651838975328512 https://x.com/GrapheneOS/status/2029651
by miohtama 7mo ago
They cannot, because for some reason GrapheneOS is shitting on them
https://x.com/GrapheneOS/status/2029651838975328512 https://x.com/GrapheneOS/status/2029651838975328512
- drnick1 7mo agoIs there anything inaccurate in that post by the Graphene devs however?
- NicuCalcea 7mo agoGraphene OS really like to shit on competing projects, it seems. Maybe they're right, but it seems a bit obsessive. /e/OS: https://x.com/GrapheneOS/status/1946269698498105813 https://x.com/GrapheneOS/status/1946269698498105813 iodéOS: https://x.com/GrapheneOS/status/1892555359656534284 https://x.com/GrapheneOS/status/1892555359656534284 CalyxOS: https://x.com/GrapheneOS/status/1953856218931376421 https://x.com/GrapheneOS/status/1953856218931376421 Unplugged: https://x.com/GrapheneOS/status/1861593971685798351 https://x.com/GrapheneOS/status/1861593971685798351 PinePhone: https://x.com/GrapheneOS/status/1964441930760409499 https://x.com/GrapheneOS/status/1964441930760409499
- fsflover 7mo agoMore projects: Kicksecure: https://forums.kicksecure.com/t/grapheneos-attacks-kicksecure-what-should-the-response-be/739 https://forums.kicksecure.com/t/grapheneos-attacks-kicksecur... Purism Librem 5 and Pinephone: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47260196 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47260196
- gruez 7mo agoSeems fair given that it was in response to a tweet referring to the phone as "ULTRA secure!"
- miohtama 7mo agoYes but that was not from Jolla, but some random Twitter user. They were also shitting on it earlier in December, so GrapheneOS is probably run by some teenagers going through problematic puberty https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/115685433938468549 https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/115685433938468549
- gruez 7mo ago>Yes but that was not from Jolla, but some random Twitter user. So if a random auto blog was saying how Tesla FSD was "ULTRA reliable", it wouldn't be fair for Waymo (or anyone else) to reply back and point that out?