3 ms·
At a certain point, I think we had reached a kind of equilibrium where some corporations were decent open source citizens. They understood that they could open
by davidw 7mo ago
At a certain point, I think we had reached a kind of equilibrium where some corporations were decent open source citizens. They understood that they could open source things like infrastructure or libraries and keep their 'crown jewels' closed. And while Stallman types might not have been happy with that, it seemed to work out for people.
Now they've just hoovered up all the free stuff into machines that can mix it up enough to spit it out in a way that doesn't even require attribution, and you have to pay to use their machine.
- jacquesm 7mo agoAI essentially gatekeeps all of open source to companies to pluck from to their hearts content. And individual contributors using these tools and freely mixing it with their own - usual minor - contributions are another step of whitewashing because they're definitely not going to own up to writing only 5% of the stuff they got paid for. Before we had RedHat and Ubuntu, who at least were contributing back, now we have Microsoft, Anthropic and OpenAI who are racing to lock the barn door around their new captive sheep. It's just a massive IP laundromat.
- stalfie 7mo agoTo be fair to the companies, the machine was pretty hard to make, and expensive. Its not exactly unreasonable to charge for it.
- jacquesm 7mo agoIf I build a museum full of stolen art it can still be hard to make and expensive. It would be entirely unreasonable to charge for it.
- davidw 7mo agoI don't begrudge the companies charging use their machine, but writing all the code and prose and everything else that the machine ingested was hard too.