This article doesn't even try to hide the fact that it's propoganda. The CEO of Anthropic said there were two use cases, the DoD (Trump does not have the author

This article doesn't even try to hide the fact that it's propoganda. The CEO of Anthropic said there were two use cases, the DoD (Trump does not have the authority to rename it) hadn't even attempted yet, but due to this potential limitation, our hot headed SecDef decided it would be best to ban them altogether. >cleanse their supply chains of Anthropic Likening an American tech company to.. dirt? Disease? Sin? Why do they need to be cleansed? >"...it has already done harm, significant harm to the company,” he added, referring to Anthropic. What has done harm? Anthropic giving the boundaries for what their technology can and can't do? I think about the (also propaganda) 60 minutes interview with Dario. The interviewer said that Boeing doesn't give the government limitations on what it can do with planes, so how is Anthropic any different. Utter lies. This would be like Boeing saying "Our plane can't reliably fly past 800 MPH or land on top of a home" and Pete Hegseth saying he VERY much wanted to land turbine-propelled jets on home ceilings at 900 MPH, so he must ban Boeing. It's just blatant lies and propoganda. But when you and your friends run the government and own all the media companies, I guess you get to steer the conversation.