3 ms·
One of the things that irks me about this whole thing is, if it’s so clean room and distinct, why make the changes to the existing project? Why not make an enti
by dwroberts 7mo ago
One of the things that irks me about this whole thing is, if it’s so clean room and distinct, why make the changes to the existing project? Why not make an entirely new library?
The answer to that, I think, is that the authors wanted to squat an existing successful project and gain a platform from it. Hence we have news cycle discussing it.
Nobody cares about a new library using AI, but squash an existing one with this stuff, and you get attention. It’s the reputation, the GitHub stars, whatever
- nicole_express 7mo agoI mean, Blanchard was the longtime maintainer of chardet already, and had wanted to relicense it for years. So I think that complicates your picture of "squatting an existing successful project". Honestly it's a weird test case for this sort of thing. I don't think you'd see an equivalent in most open source projects.
- intrasight 7mo agoI agree. But you can't copyright goodwill and reputation. Trademark does provide some protection there, right?