3 ms·
Agreed, but there's no delivered (but not necessarily read) receipt that applies to email so that was closest I could think of that counted. The overall point r
by quietbritishjim 8mo ago
Agreed, but there's no delivered (but not necessarily read) receipt that applies to email so that was closest I could think of that counted. The overall point remains: sending an email, with no further evidence, does not count as proof of delivery (all the way to the inbox).
- hrimfaxi 8mo agoI see what you mean, and lack of a rejection email from the server is not proof of delivery either. I was looking to things like state process service laws. It doesn't seem like any type of receipt is required for electronic proof of service in California, for instance https://law.justia.com/codes/california/code-ccp/part-2/title-14/chapter-5/section-1013b/ https://law.justia.com/codes/california/code-ccp/part-2/titl...
- dataflow 8mo agoI don't know how laws work here but I can't imagine having adequate "proof of service" fully insulates you from all possible claims of non-receipt, especially electronically? Like what if the recipient was in a coma or on active duty in the middle of a war zone or something? There have got to be exceptions here to handle some cases of non-receipt despite proof of delivery, so the question of whether spam classification might be one such exception doesn't seem automatically invalid.
- thaumasiotes 8mo ago> Like what if the recipient was in a coma or on active duty in the middle of a war zone or something? There have got to be exceptions here to handle some cases of non-receipt despite proof of delivery If the recipient was in a coma, this question couldn't arise at all, because they wouldn't be able to use the service.