The precedents around TOS law is so clearly and obviously wrong. Here, the court applied an “objective-reasonableness standard” to find there was “unambiguousl

The precedents around TOS law is so clearly and obviously wrong. Here, the court applied an “objective-reasonableness standard” to find there was “unambiguously manifested assent”. Which could only be true if we give new, contrarian definitions to the words “objective”, “reasonableness”, “unambiguously” and “assent”. What’s actually happening here is companies have been given the power to write arbitrary, custom laws defining their liability and responsibilities to their customers. It’s a bad situation because it’s not possible for people to actually know what the deal is. It’s not even that good for the companies in the long run, because they all end up coming off as used car salesmen You win a case, but now Tile/Amazon === sleazy. When your product is tracking locations there’s a trust barrier you need to overcome. How much would you trust Tile (Amazon) now?