3 ms·
LLM-garbage article, ironically.
by furyofantares 8mo ago
LLM-garbage article, ironically.
- andai 8mo agoWhat makes you say that? Which LLM does it sound like to you?
- xg15 8mo agoThe paragraph "The ImageNet Moment" stuck out to me. It's so stuffed of the current AI-isms that I have a hard time seeing this as chance.
- canjobear 8mo ago> Not because the methods it displaced had stopped working, but because the money, the talent, and the prestige had moved elsewhere. The researchers who understood decision theory, Bayesian inference, and operations research didn’t lose their arguments. They lost their audience.
- naasking 8mo agoSo, what's the problem with it?
- LolWolf 8mo agoyeah it’s slop; multiple sites also confirm this, seems like they are using clawdbot or whatever
- furyofantares 8mo agoExcessive headings for short sections is the easiest thing to spot first as you can raise a red flag just by scrolling. I recommend scrolling any AI-adjacent article and see how many headings it has, and how often they start with the word "The". You'll then find lots of "Blah blah blah: blah blah blah." Ten of the sentences in this article are of that form. Then there's of course "it's not x but y". It avoids that exact construction, but is still plentiful in the article. > What happened next was not a reasoned evaluation of competing paradigms. It was a gold rush. > Not because the methods it displaced had stopped working, but because the money, the talent, and the prestige had moved elsewhere.
- rstuart4133 8mo agoI swear it's the modern version of "beowulf cluster" comment on slashdot. They also got very tiresome long before fading away.