3 ms·
I'm curious what makes that obviously llm? As far as I can tell it was a short and fairly benign statement with little scope to give away llm-ness?
by Incipient 7mo ago
I'm curious what makes that obviously llm? As far as I can tell it was a short and fairly benign statement with little scope to give away llm-ness?
- mrkeen 7mo agoJust as bad if it's human. No information has been shared. The writer has turned idle wondering into prose: > Once threads actually run concurrently, libraries (which?) that never needed locking (contradiction?) could (will they or won't they?) start hitting race conditions in surprising (go on, surprise me) places.
- elar_verole 7mo agoIt's just the equivalent of that one student restating what the teacher just said with no added value
- OskarS 7mo agoIt was an essentially pointless platitude about the GIL from a very new account not really related to the article, and all comments from this account are the same: top level comments with lots of em-dashes that are just a vague piece of pablum somewhat related to the subject. If it was just this comment, sure, it could be possible it's a rather uninteresting human. But given the history, this account is pure AI slop.