4 ms·
You have a fair perspective and I'm not going to try to move you from it. You have my exact opinion as of 3 months ago. I will just suggest you earnestly try it
by reedf1 7mo ago
You have a fair perspective and I'm not going to try to move you from it. You have my exact opinion as of 3 months ago. I will just suggest you earnestly try it yourself.
- Grimblewald 7mo agoI have, hence my perspective. For boiler plate and solved problems, it can do ok. However, anytime it needs to do something novel it will be hit and miss, usually miss. If it needs to do something where best practice has changed but training data overwhelmingly does bad / dated practice, you'll get that if you don't specify. Loads of issues like that. So, without giving small isolated and well framed tasks the output of which is then critically engaged with, you'll get increasingly opaque and unstable code.