3 ms·
As far as I know, most countries don't require such an agreement because they don't develop nuclear weapons. Are we forgetting that Iran has autonomy?
by lwansbrough 7mo ago
As far as I know, most countries don't require such an agreement because they don't develop nuclear weapons. Are we forgetting that Iran has autonomy?
- Hikikomori 7mo agoMost counties have signed non proliferation agreements.
- lwansbrough 7mo agoIran themselves are an NPT signatory! And yet they pursue nuclear weapons while countries like Japan, Germany, Canada and Netherlands do not.
- Hikikomori 7mo agoThey probably should get started on that as it seems to be the only detterent for genocidal regimes like Russia, US and Israel from attacking you.
- lwansbrough 7mo agoNo. The greater deterrent is to make the world so complexly integrated that such actions carry an enormous cost.
- myrmidon 7mo agoThat whole approach has a bad historical track record-- people tought WW1 "impossible" for the exact same reason. Not only that, but the only way to do this is to stack the risk against yourself in the case it ever fails. Just look at the EU/Russia energy dependency. There is good reason that no serious nation does this (intentionally) with actually vital goods like their food supply (not even among allies, really).
- Hikikomori 7mo agoJoin the American hegemony or get bombed?