4 ms·
I don't understand why the poster (which is the author) links us to a slop report of a test for their library. It would be much more effective to cover part of
by harperlee 7mo ago
I don't understand why the poster (which is the author) links us to a slop report of a test for their library. It would be much more effective to cover part of this info into the README where we get the context of what they want to achieve (where there is a very clear "Why?" section), and then link to it instead. I have flagged it as AI slop.
- karel-3d 7mo agoI don't understand LISP or Clojure, but it seems to be some kind of library for making web services out of LISP, which has some separate components that are somehow well defined. And somehow it's all related to AI. Again I don't know much about Clojure and I am too slow for functional programming in general.
- yogthos 7mo agoThe whole point of the framework is to see what LLM oriented framework would look like. My argument is that the way code is normally structured is not conducive towards LLMs because context grows in unbounded way, and they end up getting lost. The whole point of the 'slop' report is to have the LLM try implementing the features using both the traditional approach and the framework and then reflect on how it fared with each approach.