2 ms·
Moreover, they don't even apologize: "The work is public, hence the name. It's well known, it's in the data. Who cares". What will they do next? Create simila
by bayindirh 8mo ago
Moreover, they don't even apologize:
"The work is public, hence the name. It's well known, it's in the data. Who cares".
What will they do next? Create similar publications with domainsquatting and write all-AI articles with the "public" names?
Is it still fair use, then?
- kome 8mo agoyes i hate that. they still have the chutzpah of keeping doing it. and i am sure it's illegal in multiple legislation. because they are not writing articles where you can cite people, they are selling a product.
- bayindirh 8mo agoI think we can thank the current times and developments as a whole for unearthing the greediest of the greedy among us. It's very enlightening, if you ask me.