3 ms·

that's so scummy. why they even needs "names"? it's a rhetorical question...

• bayindirh 7mo ago
  Moreover, they don't even apologize: "The work is public, hence the name. It's well known, it's in the data. Who cares". What will they do next? Create similar publications with domainsquatting and write all-AI articles with the "public" names? Is it still fair use, then?
  • kome 7mo ago
    yes i hate that. they still have the chutzpah of keeping doing it. and i am sure it's illegal in multiple legislation. because they are not writing articles where you can cite people, they are selling a product.
    • bayindirh 7mo ago
      I think we can thank the current times and developments as a whole for unearthing the greediest of the greedy among us. It's very enlightening, if you ask me.
• SoKamil 7mo ago
  Authority washing.