3 ms·
A blatant violation of both the first and second amendment. Not unusual for California though. I wonder how Democrats will react when the precedent they set wil
by SilverElfin 8mo ago
A blatant violation of both the first and second amendment. Not unusual for California though. I wonder how Democrats will react when the precedent they set will be used against their ideologies by red states.
I am also disturbed by how California politics are spreading:
> Aside from this civil liability case, the California State legislature is also considering a bill that would restrict 3D printer sales to state-approved models, one of the steps it’s considering to help control the proliferation of 3D-printed ghost guns. Other states are also taking steps to address this issue, including New York, which is working on a law that puts the burden of stopping weapon printing on 3D printer makers, Washington state, which is suggesting “blocking features” and a blueprint detection algorithm, and Colorado, which is focusing on the possession of 3D printed gun files.
- conception 8mo agoRed states already have by criminalizing cross-state abortions. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/05/hb-481-georgia-law-criminalizes-abortion-subjects-women-to-life-in-prison.html https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/05/hb-481-georgia-l...
- eurleif 8mo ago>A blatant violation of both the first and second amendment. That defense didn't do too well in another case: https://www.courthousenews.com/third-circuit-backs-new-jerseys-crackdown-on-3d-printed-gun-code/ https://www.courthousenews.com/third-circuit-backs-new-jerse...