4 ms·
California sues websites hosting 3D printed gun files
- SilverElfin 8mo agoA blatant violation of both the first and second amendment. Not unusual for California though. I wonder how Democrats will react when the precedent they set will be used against their ideologies by red states. I am also disturbed by how California politics are spreading: > Aside from this civil liability case, the California State legislature is also considering a bill that would restrict 3D printer sales to state-approved models, one of the steps it’s considering to help control the proliferation of 3D-printed ghost guns. Other states are also taking steps to address this issue, including New York, which is working on a law that puts the burden of stopping weapon printing on 3D printer makers, Washington state, which is suggesting “blocking features” and a blueprint detection algorithm, and Colorado, which is focusing on the possession of 3D printed gun files.
- conception 8mo agoRed states already have by criminalizing cross-state abortions. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/05/hb-481-georgia-law-criminalizes-abortion-subjects-women-to-life-in-prison.html https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/05/hb-481-georgia-l...
- eurleif 8mo ago>A blatant violation of both the first and second amendment. That defense didn't do too well in another case: https://www.courthousenews.com/third-circuit-backs-new-jerseys-crackdown-on-3d-printed-gun-code/ https://www.courthousenews.com/third-circuit-backs-new-jerse...
- metalcrow 8mo agoAre any of the people hosting these websites present in California? I would guess that they must, otherwise it would have to be a federal trial, but i have no idea.
- SilverElfin 8mo agoIf you violate the laws of one state while doing business there, even if you are located in another state, you can be extradited there. I wonder if California is going this route. But it is a bad move because this will end up being used in reverse by the red states once they create this playbook.
- metalcrow 8mo agoGood to know! Although isn't extradition only possible for criminal charges, not civil? The article claims this is a civil charge.