>Now, we're seeing a technology which most professional developers — that have used it seriously, at least — insist is orders of magnitude better than anything

>Now, we're seeing a technology which most professional developers — that have used it seriously, at least — insist is orders of magnitude better than anything else that's come before it. You can't just assert this. I could equally-baselessly say most professional developers have used LLMs and find them, overall, more trouble than they're worth. Except it's not totally baseless because I think that was actually a result of a study, IIRC.