3 ms·
I don't see a problem with that. If party 'A' has something belonging to party 'B'. Just because the property is inaccessible or destroyed doesn't suddenly ev
by njharman 14y ago
I don't see a problem with that. If party 'A' has something belonging to party 'B'. Just because the property is inaccessible or destroyed doesn't suddenly evaporate's 'A' responsibility for returning it.
Comcast should provide a grace period 30-60 days, but that's about it.
- gm 14y agoAgreed. Not sure why people see a problem with this simple principle. It's not like they would be ok with Comcast saying "We're having cash flow issues, so we took the liberty of charging you double this month"
- wmf 14y agoNot in this particular case, but sometimes I feel like "the customer is always right" has become a license to steal for some people.