I've watched this thread with puzzlement because it was almost immediately a dead link. ...and I couldn't readily find it at sciencedaily.com Now that it's a P

I've watched this thread with puzzlement because it was almost immediately a dead link. ...and I couldn't readily find it at sciencedaily.com Now that it's a Phoenix from its ashes I understand its death: the article is from April 2007. Unfortunately, mj research seems to produce "discussions" that combine the fervor of religious + political topics. The cited study is just one more study in the mj research legacy that shows lots of possible damages and several possible benefits of cannabis depending on the application and the population concerned. Recommendation: cool heads, please (not for the pun).