3 ms·

As with any tech revolution, jobs don’t go away in total but the types of jobs do. There aren’t a lot of buggy whip manufacturers any more. Professionals photog

As with any tech revolution, jobs don’t go away in total but the types of jobs do. There aren’t a lot of buggy whip manufacturers any more. Professionals photography has taken a sharp decline. Certain kinds of white collar work are a dead end now.

gjsman-1000 7mo ago
Professional photography is still expected to grow over the next decade. It’s a competitive field but hasn’t actually shrunk much.
- conception 7mo ago
  https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LEU0254486700A https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LEU0254486700A Doesn’t look like a stable, growing profession. And if you compare it to the 70s-00’s it got really rough around 2010 for obvious reasons.
101008 7mo ago
I think progessional photography is so wide as a definition that makes no sense. Product photography could be somehow replaced with AI, maybe, but not journalist photography at all. In fact, journalism photography is more importnat than ever with AI now.
- sam0x17 7mo ago
  There is a lot less of having the picture-taking-man come to take a picture for $$
- conception 7mo ago
  Not AI related, cell phone camera related. Crushed the sector.
simianwords 7mo ago
[flagged]
- bombcar 7mo ago
  You don't pay a photographer to click the shutter button; you pay them to handle all the details of composing a good shot, knowing what you'll want afterwards, etc.
- wongarsu 7mo ago
  Even if we completely ignore the artistic and technical merit and complexity (which I would argue mostly moved to post-processing images) or the ability to catch or create the moments you want to capture, simply the fact that someone has to hold and point the camera makes it a job that will continue to exist. If you have a wedding and want pictures, someone has to take them. That won't be the bride or the groom, and shoving the responsibility onto one of the guests isn't nice (it would detract from their enjoyment of the event after all). So you hire someone to do it. Kind of like a job
  - simianwords 7mo ago
    > the ability to catch or create the moments you want to capture, simply the fact that someone has to hold and point the camera makes it a job that will continue to exist my bad, yeah that part is needed but as an artistic expression i don't see the point.
- BoxFour 7mo ago
  It’s pretty obvious that professional photography takes real skill if you’ve ever experienced the disaster of someone trying to cut costs by hiring an amateur photographer for a major event like a wedding but expecting professional results (the mismatch in expectations being the key cause of disaster here). I’m not saying it turns out bad 100% of the time, but it’s easy to forget because good professionals make it look effortless. When the skill isn’t there, though, and you're used to only seeing professional photos it becomes very obvious (and again, that's perfectly fine if you're not expecting professional photography).
anonymars 7mo ago
> There aren’t a lot of buggy whip manufacturers any more Nor horses...

gjsman-1000 7mo ago

Professional photography is still expected to grow over the next decade. It’s a competitive field but hasn’t actually shrunk much.

conception 7mo ago
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LEU0254486700A https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LEU0254486700A Doesn’t look like a stable, growing profession. And if you compare it to the 70s-00’s it got really rough around 2010 for obvious reasons.

101008 7mo ago

I think progessional photography is so wide as a definition that makes no sense. Product photography could be somehow replaced with AI, maybe, but not journalist photography at all. In fact, journalism photography is more importnat than ever with AI now.

sam0x17 7mo ago
There is a lot less of having the picture-taking-man come to take a picture for $$
conception 7mo ago
Not AI related, cell phone camera related. Crushed the sector.

simianwords 7mo ago

[flagged]

bombcar 7mo ago
You don't pay a photographer to click the shutter button; you pay them to handle all the details of composing a good shot, knowing what you'll want afterwards, etc.
wongarsu 7mo ago
Even if we completely ignore the artistic and technical merit and complexity (which I would argue mostly moved to post-processing images) or the ability to catch or create the moments you want to capture, simply the fact that someone has to hold and point the camera makes it a job that will continue to exist. If you have a wedding and want pictures, someone has to take them. That won't be the bride or the groom, and shoving the responsibility onto one of the guests isn't nice (it would detract from their enjoyment of the event after all). So you hire someone to do it. Kind of like a job
- simianwords 7mo ago
  > the ability to catch or create the moments you want to capture, simply the fact that someone has to hold and point the camera makes it a job that will continue to exist my bad, yeah that part is needed but as an artistic expression i don't see the point.
BoxFour 7mo ago
It’s pretty obvious that professional photography takes real skill if you’ve ever experienced the disaster of someone trying to cut costs by hiring an amateur photographer for a major event like a wedding but expecting professional results (the mismatch in expectations being the key cause of disaster here). I’m not saying it turns out bad 100% of the time, but it’s easy to forget because good professionals make it look effortless. When the skill isn’t there, though, and you're used to only seeing professional photos it becomes very obvious (and again, that's perfectly fine if you're not expecting professional photography).

anonymars 7mo ago

> There aren’t a lot of buggy whip manufacturers any more Nor horses...