4 ms·
This reminds of recent cases where individuals were threatened with engineering without a license when they went up against larger institutions: https://www.vi
by Aurornis 8mo ago
This reminds of recent cases where individuals were threatened with engineering without a license when they went up against larger institutions:
https://www.vice.com/en/article/state-charges-77-year-old-for-practicing-engineering-without-a-license/ https://www.vice.com/en/article/state-charges-77-year-old-fo...
https://reason.com/2020/03/02/oregon-tried-to-silence-this-engineers-red-light-camera-research-now-experts-say-he-was-right-all-along/ https://reason.com/2020/03/02/oregon-tried-to-silence-this-e...
I predict many will jump to side against OpenAI in this case because they don’t like OpenAI, but be mindful about what you’re wishing for. I don’t believe we’re better off when we force information to be siloed away where only licensed individuals are allowed to discuss topics and charge very high hourly rates for it.
- arter45 8mo agoThe point is not forbidding discussion. Advice on important matters that may have serious legal or medical implications should be done by professionals who can be held accountable for their behavior, not sentence generators hosted by mostly unaccountable tech companies (which may be in another jurisdiction altogether). Information is not siloed away by requiring license for legal or medical advice. It’s not like someone is hiding law codes or whatever.