4 ms·
ever tried living while simultaneously deciding to only patron groups that strictly morally and ethically align to your own personal beliefs? I would love to,
by serf 7mo ago
ever tried living while simultaneously deciding to only patron groups that strictly morally and ethically align to your own personal beliefs?
I would love to, but a practical look at that concept seems practically impossible.
My .02c : Claude was already involved in underhanded shit I don't want a part of[0] and that generated little ethical response from Anthropic , i've had better luck as a 200/mo tier customer with ChatGPT, and I don't really think that Dario claiming that their newest LLM is conscious[1] on a market schedule is all that ethical, either.
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Maven https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Maven
[1]: https://tech.yahoo.com/ai/claude/articles/anthropic-ceo-admits-dont-know-183053024.html?guccounter=1 https://tech.yahoo.com/ai/claude/articles/anthropic-ceo-admi...
- kelseyfrog 7mo agoWhy paint the choice as black and white? Most people are doing the best they can morally even if they don't get it 100% right. Even living 60% in accordance with your values is better than 50%. Likewise, bucketing organizations as good or bad misses the same nuance. Choosing something that is slightly better is has positive consequences despite it not being 100% good.