3 ms·
Difference is though, with an internal combustion engine, the "turning fuel into power" happens inside the car. Whereas with electric cars, it happens at a pow
by mibbitier 14y ago
Difference is though, with an internal combustion engine, the "turning fuel into power" happens inside the car.
Whereas with electric cars, it happens at a power plant... then gets sent to the car via electricity, with lots of it wasted along the way.
Personally, I don't see electric cars as solving anything. We should be looking at generating the power in the car, from things that are plentiful - water, dirt, garbage, sewage etc.
- juiceandjuice 14y agoNo, Gasoline is highly refined compared to oil. Diesel isn't as much. So "Turning fuel into energy" is really "Turning Oil into Fuel using chemicals and energy which in turn can be turned into energy" You still need a refinery and a very large distribution network consisting or trains, trucks, and pipelines. Your assumption of transmission energy loss is silly when you compare the required energy of transporting things like oil and water around.
- knightni 14y agoYour average car engine is dramatically less efficient than a power plant.
- manmal 14y agoMy understanding is that power loss through transmission averages at 6-7% for electricity (don't know if the Wikipedia article includes all losses happening: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_power_transmission#Losses http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_power_transmission#Los...), which is really not that bad. I am not an engineer, but converting oil to gasoline/diesel, distributing it and burning it at an inefficient RPM in a car might be just as bad or worse.
- jlgreco 14y agoIf cars were really as efficient as you seem to think, then we should be replacing all of our coal burning power plants with massive stacks of car engines. Of course power plants are much more efficient.