3 ms·
> They were just more familiar, so they don't seem as self righteous. I mean, I think it's maybe just that a certain subset of the readership are now unhappy w
by rsynnott 8mo ago
> They were just more familiar, so they don't seem as self righteous.
I mean, I think it's maybe just that a certain subset of the readership are now unhappy with any discussion of sexuality (I suspect that people like this simply didn't really read sci-fi in the past). In particular, look at Heinlein; a lot of his stuff would be very out there _today_ (the Moon is a Harsh Mistress is quite mild by Heinlein-weird-sex-stuff standards).
The complaint about politics is too silly to take seriously at all; sci-fi has _always_ been about politics, to the point where it is difficult to come up with non-YA examples of politics-free sci-fi.
- readthenotes1 8mo agoNo, it's the poor quality of writing, using irrelevant lecture to try to push home a point as opposed to the story doing so seemingly naturally.