3 ms·
Yes, of course. I mean, is all production code reviewed?
by cpncrunch 7mo ago
Yes, of course. I mean, is all production code reviewed?
- DrewADesign 7mo agoSorry, I wasn’t giving a serious answer. It’s just not as amusingly worded as in thought. Seriously, though, your question is one of those “how long is a piece of string” sort of questions. Just like any other software quality question, it depends on context, competence, goals, market dynamics, organizational culture, project timelines, team expertise, etc. Do people pay their bills on time? Do people wear seatbelts? Do people brush their teeth for the full two recommended minutes? Depends, depends, depends.
- cpncrunch 7mo agoSorry, I didn't realise you weren't the OP. I was really asking the OP as they said they had large productivity gains from using AI to code. But if you're a professional developer, the same question can be answered by you: do you specifically review all AI generated production code? In my own case 100% of my code is reviewed by humans (generally me), and that IMO is the only sensible option, and has been the standard since I started coding commercially 33 years ago. I don't use AI to generate code though, other than a few experiments, as I don't really need to write much code these days.
- bmd1905 7mo ago[dead]
- deleted 7mo ago[deleted]
- DrewADesign 7mo agoIf you’re going to spam your product, you could have the decency to have literally any other contributions on your account. It’s literally just advertisements and I’ll bet a straw penny they’re generated by a chatbot.
- cpncrunch 7mo agoIronically they seem to use ai to review ai generated code, which is the main problem.
- DrewADesign 7mo agoIndeed. And the ouroboros takes another big bite!