2 ms·

> Software engineering was supposed to be artificial intelligence’s easiest win. At what point in time? Did anyone foresee coding being one of the best and soo

• antonvs 8mo ago
  They're probably talking about some point after the capabilities of LLMs started to become clear. It's why Codex, Claude Code, Gemini CLI etc. were developed at all - it was clear that if you wanted a concrete application of LLMs with clear productivity benefits, coding was low-hanging fruit, so all the AI vendors jumped on that and started hyping it.
  • whattheheckheck 8mo ago
    Because swe was the furthest advanced "collaborative cognition" field in terms of human workflows
  • furyofantares 8mo ago
    Sure, but jumping from its amazing these things work for code at all to software engineering is solved is something only grifters or those drunk on the kool-aid did. I do agree that it was thought that these llm-agents would be extremely useful and that is why they were developed, and I happen to believe they in fact are extremely useful (without disagreeing that much of the stuff in the article definitely does happen.) I just sort of resent the setup that it was supposed to be X but actually it failed, when not only is there only minor evidence that it failed, but it was only a brief period in time when it was supposed to be X.
• Copyrightest 8mo ago
  [dead]
• throwaway314155 8mo ago
  No one saw it coming.
• djeastm 8mo ago
  I seem to recall short snippets of IDE code completion being one of the first commercial applications of it.