4 ms·
[flagged]
by heavyset_go 8mo ago
[flagged]
- coliveira 8mo agoI'm not a fan of AI and try to avoid it, but there is a difference from AI output published by someone knowledgeable and any other AI output that you run by yourself. If an expert looked at the result and found it to be ok, then you can have some assurance that it at least makes sense. Your own AI run doesn't mean anything, it could be 100% hallucination and a non-expert will buy it as truth.
- Joel_Mckay 8mo agoUnfortunately, LLM slop now makes up >53% of the web, and is growing. It is easy to spot the compacted token distribution unique to each model, but search engines still seem to promote nonsense content. =3 "Bad Bot Problem - Computerphile" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AjQNDCYL5Rg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AjQNDCYL5Rg "A Day in the Life of an Ensh*ttificator " https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T4Upf_B9RLQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T4Upf_B9RLQ
- josephg 8mo ago> If you're going to do that at least mention it's LLM output Yes, this! Please label AI generated content. Pull request written by an AI? Label it as ai generated. Blog post? Article generated with AI? Say so! It’s ok to use AI models. Especially if English is your second language. But put a disclaimer in. Don’t make the reader guess. Eg: > This content was partially generated by chatgpt Or > Blog post text written entirely by human hand, code examples by Claude code
- fragmede 8mo agoHave any outlines you'd care to share?
- heavyset_go 8mo agoNo, I don't use LLMs to write.