4 ms·
I don't understand. You specifically: > neglected to include my usual "zero-framework" constraint in the prompt And then your complaint is that it included a
by crazygringo 8mo ago
I don't understand. You specifically:
> neglected to include my usual "zero-framework" constraint in the prompt
And then your complaint is that it included a bunch of dependencies?
AI's do what you tell them. I don't understand how you conclude:
> If a simple editor requires 89 third-party packages to exist
It obviously doesn't. Why even bother complaining about an AI's default choices when it's so trivial to change them just by asking?
- codazoda 8mo agoMy main point is that we need to expertly drive these tools. I forgot the trivial instruction and ended up with something that more closely resembles modern software instead of what I personally value. AI still requires our expertise to guide it. I'm not sure if that will be the case in a year, but it is today.
- mlrtime 8mo agoYou seem intelligent so it is probably confusing to many why you are posting this. You call it a trivial instruction, but it is not trivial. It was a core requirement for your own design that you neglected to specify. This is not different than leaving out any other core requirement for a engineering specification. Most people would NOT want this requirement. Meaning most people wouldn't care if there are package dependencies are not, so the agent 100% did the right thing.
- deleted 8mo ago[deleted]
- hkonte 8mo ago[dead]