4 ms·
I'm not a gmail user, but "organize by thread" in Mail.app sounds a hell of a lot like "conversation" view.
by anatoli 18y ago
I'm not a gmail user, but "organize by thread" in Mail.app sounds a hell of a lot like "conversation" view.
- gsiener 18y agoI'm glad you mentioned that...threads++
- smanek 18y agoThe real problem is that the heuristics that Mail.app and Gmail use to determine which emails constitute a thread/conversation are slightly different. That means that GMail might count ten messages as being part of a conversation, but Mail.app will only count 8 of those as being part of the same thread. It seems minor - but it's really infuriating when you try to switch back and forth.
- zacharypinter 18y agoConversation view in Mail.app is nice, but it really only threads the messages in your inbox (or current folder). Gmail's threads are a bit nicer since it'll grab all the related messages even if they've already been archived.
- thwarted 18y agoThat's part of the real power of gmail's mail handling methods. Like POP (and the concept of "delete or keep on server"), a message can "logically" only exist in one place at a time. IMAP can move/copy messages, but if the same message exists in multiple places, they appear as two distinct messages. In gmail, the message only appears in one place, the single, massive mail store. How things are tagged, er I mean labeled, determine your view on them. Since labels don't move or copy things, they are available to be pulled into different views without breaking a concept of different storage locations. The fact that IMAP works reasonably well on top of gmail's labeling is impressive.