4 ms·
I think the idea that animals don't have altruistic abilities is incorrect. Besides the occasional news stories of animals doing seemingly altruistic things (so
by hnruss 14y ago
I think the idea that animals don't have altruistic abilities is incorrect. Besides the occasional news stories of animals doing seemingly altruistic things (sometimes even for other species), the common act of an animal raising it's young is inherently altruistic.
- KingMob 14y agoIt's necessary to distinguish between kin and non-kin altruism in these cases. Kin altruism follows easily from the perspective of gene replication. Genes that lead parents to ignore infants that require care tend not to get replicated; genes that encourage nurturing helpless infants tend to survive on to subsequent generations. Non-kin altruism is much rarer, but not impossible. There's a lot of cool math and game theory revolving around reciprocality rates and cost-benefit analyses in demonstrating rates of non-kin altruism in non-human species. (E.g., vampire bat blood-sharing, prey warning calls.) Of course, humans are the major outlier, since we will frequently hold a door open for a complete stranger with no realistic expectation of reciprocation. Lastly, some cases of cross-species altruism represent, not real altruism, but instinctive nurturing and bonding activities that have been "hijacked" by circumstances. E.g., a lioness whose cubs died will allow piglets to feed, which will placate motherly instincts.