> and 99 of them send him to the battlefield by himself, saying "good luck buddy, let us know how it works out?" >The army was going to be reduced by a factor

> and 99 of them send him to the battlefield by himself, saying "good luck buddy, let us know how it works out?" >The army was going to be reduced by a factor of 100, and two tiny armies were going to face off while the majority of men of fighting age were going to sit at home and paint landscape paintings? Really? Well, for a time greek city states did fight pretty much like this. Small armies of hoplites were raised outside harvest season, went out, fought almost show-battles with very few casualties, and tribute changed hands based on the results. Everyone went home for the harvest. I believe there's even instances where a battle wasn't fought at all in favour of two appointed champions dueling (origin of the popular fiction trope) It didn't last, but for a time the greek city states had a kind of equilibrium with relatively few resources (or people) spent on war.