3 ms·
There is also evil-helix [0] a helix fork with vim bindings. Maybe that‘s something you would enjoy :) [0] https://github.com/usagi-flow/evil-helix https://gi
by itsn0tm3 7mo ago
There is also evil-helix [0] a helix fork with vim bindings.
Maybe that‘s something you would enjoy :)
[0] https://github.com/usagi-flow/evil-helix https://github.com/usagi-flow/evil-helix
- deafpolygon 7mo agoat that point… use vim? genuinely asking. what does this get you?
- lukaslalinsky 7mo agoNot having to deal with neovim plugins is a HUGE win. Using neovim with plugins feels like using a rolling Linux distro, you never know what breaks next. That's what I use zed, personally. It's the best modern vi-like editor, in my opinion.
- xigoi 7mo ago> Using neovim with plugins feels like using a rolling Linux distro, you never know what breaks next. You can just… not update them.
- lukaslalinsky 7mo agoThey don't have LTS releases, there is always a bug somewhere and the bug fix includes a number of features, if not new dependencies.
- GCUMstlyHarmls 7mo agoYeah I always see this "issue" with Neovim and its almost entirely user-cultural, installing big blobs of plugins, updating to edge every day and some kind of jones's pressure. These days you can probably install mini.vim to get basically every paper cut fixed (eg extra "surround objects", aligning text, plugin manager etc), a theme, a few other assortments to taste and park your plugins at known commits or include them in your dotfiles and its ... fine. I haven't updated my plugins in probably 6 months and when I do I update them selectively only if there is actually a reason to do it or the changes are very minor.
- GCUMstlyHarmls 7mo agomini.nvim*
- itsn0tm3 7mo agoI just use neovim ;) Just commented to inform. But I can see the benefit of something like evil-helix, very limited setup being needed and getting features like LSP out of the box …