i don't understand the problem with one-line summaries. if you stop question them and pleading with people to remove them there wouldn't be this whole thread an

i don't understand the problem with one-line summaries. if you stop question them and pleading with people to remove them there wouldn't be this whole thread anyway. also: > "By the way, I've flagged the article based on this. The main idea is solid (you've got to learn how to read people) but the execution was flawed. Besides, it's off-topic IMHO." weird. i appreciated the insight in this article, as well as the general brevity. is flagging the new down-voting? or am i missing the scope of what should be flagged? (i rarely downvote and have never flagged. i like to be inclusive. i also see the necessity of information overload handlers, so we might just want completely different systems). [edit: eit. looks like the flag point was handled by mechanical_fish and inerte above. good work :-p]